Not another yes-or-no verdict. A verifiable map of what the evidence actually says, how certain it is, and why studies disagree.
The signal is more consistent for processed than unprocessed meat. Individual risk still depends on baseline consumption and personal risk factors.
Association ≠ causation. A statistical relationship may still reflect confounding or measurement error.
Hazard ≠ individual risk. An IARC classification does not tell you how much one person’s risk changes.
Compared with what? Replacing meat with legumes is not the same as replacing it with refined carbohydrates.
These 8 sources demonstrate the product; they are not yet a complete systematic review. The full corpus will be deduplicated, checked by two reviewers and published under a preregistered protocol.
A questionnaire completed once twenty years ago is not equivalent to repeated diaries or biomarkers.
Potential impact: highMeat versus legumes can yield a different answer than meat versus white bread or a similar diet.
Potential impact: very highSmoking, income, physical activity and overall diet quality may move together with meat intake.
Potential impact: highA sponsor can shape the question, comparator, duration and conclusion without falsifying the numbers.
Analyze it; never use it as an automatic vetoA plain-language conclusion, certainty level and the most important caveat appear before the technical detail.
Readers can see how comparator, study design, funding or exclusion choices change the conclusion.
Every sentence points back to the study, method, data availability and revision history behind it.
AI accelerates the work; it does not get the final word. Every step keeps its source, version, confidence and human review.
Databases, registries, gray literature and multiple languages
One study, even when it produces many papers
Methods and numbers linked to the original page
Two reviewers and design-specific tools
Alternative analyses, funding and sensitivity
New studies without erasing version history
Searches, exclusions, extractions and analyses have a verifiable history.
Funding and sponsor roles become queryable data, not footnotes.
Every evidence card can be challenged with sources; revisions stay public.
First concept for onde.media · Pilot topic: red meat